PC Magazine has a review of the new Motorola RAZR V3 at http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,1712386,00.asp. The reviewer likes the device, but states “Software-wise, the RAZR is basically a Motorola V505, which is a pretty good thing”. Pretty good thing? I beg to differ, and if it really is the same old lousy software (as many suspected) I am going to have to pass. Shame.